Slovensko: Za \u00fa\u010delom lep\u0161ej vymo\u017eite\u013enosti uplat\u0148ovan\u00e9ho n\u00e1roku m\u00f4\u017ee s\u00fad zriadi\u0165 z\u00e1lo\u017en\u00e9 pr\u00e1vo na majetku dl\u017en\u00edka.<\/p>\n
Nosnou \u00falohou rekodifik\u00e1cie civiln\u00e9ho procesu bolo prispie\u0165 k rie\u0161eniu jedn\u00e9ho z najp\u00e1l\u010divej\u0161\u00edch spolo\u010densk\u00fdch probl\u00e9mov, ktor\u00fdm bezpochyby je vymo\u017eite\u013enos\u0165 pr\u00e1va.<\/p>\n
Neraz sa stane, \u017ee po\u010das dlhotrvaj\u00faceho s\u00fadneho sporu, ak\u00fdch je na Slovensku ne\u00farekom, sa dl\u017en\u00edk vzh\u013eadom na nepriazniv\u00fd v\u00fdvoj situ\u00e1cie za\u010dne \u00fa\u010delovo zbavova\u0165 svojho exek\u00faciou postihnute\u013en\u00e9ho majetku. Na konci d\u0148a m\u00e1 tak verite\u013e, aj to napriek rozsudku vydan\u00e9ho v jeho prospech, probl\u00e9m dom\u00f4c\u0165 sa svojej s\u00fadom priznanej poh\u013ead\u00e1vky.<\/p>\n
Jedn\u00fdm z n\u00e1strojov, ktor\u00fd m\u00e1 prispie\u0165 k zlep\u0161eniu popisovan\u00e9ho stavu, je \u00faplne nov\u00fd in\u0161tit\u00fat zabezpe\u010dovacieho opatrenia, ktor\u00fd do n\u00e1\u0161ho pr\u00e1vneho poriadku zav\u00e1dza Civiln\u00fd sporov\u00fd poriadok.<\/p>\n
Zabezpe\u010dovacie opatrenie naria\u010fuje s\u00fad na n\u00e1vrh. S\u00fad m\u00f4\u017ee zabezpe\u010dovacie opatrenie nariadi\u0165 nielen pred alebo po\u010das konania, ale v od\u00f4vodnen\u00fdch pr\u00edpadoch dokonca aj po jeho skon\u010den\u00ed. Na rozdiel od predch\u00e1dzaj\u00facej pr\u00e1vnej \u00fapravy t\u00fdkaj\u00facej sa predbe\u017en\u00e9ho opatrenia, pri nariaden\u00ed zabezpe\u010dovacieho opatrenia, pred za\u010dat\u00edm konania nemus\u00ed s\u00fad navrhovate\u013eovi obligat\u00f3rne ulo\u017ei\u0165 povinnos\u0165 poda\u0165 v ur\u010ditej lehote \u017ealobu vo veci samej. T\u00fdmto sa tak pred\u00edde mnohokr\u00e1t umelo vyn\u00faten\u00fdm s\u00fadnym sporom, \u010do pom\u00f4\u017ee od\u013eah\u010di\u0165 s\u00fady, a t\u00fdm p\u00e1dom sk\u00f4r poskytn\u00fa\u0165 \u017eiadan\u00fa ochranu.<\/p>\n
Podstata zabezpe\u010dovacieho opatrenia spo\u010d\u00edva v tom, \u017ee s\u00fad m\u00f4\u017ee na n\u00e1vrh zriadi\u0165 z\u00e1lo\u017en\u00e9 pr\u00e1vo, ktor\u00e9 m\u00e1 povahu riadneho z\u00e1lo\u017en\u00e9ho pr\u00e1va. V pr\u00edpade plurality z\u00e1lo\u017en\u00fdch pr\u00e1v na predmete z\u00e1lo\u017en\u00e9ho pr\u00e1va garantuje z\u00e1lo\u017en\u00e9mu verite\u013eovi relevantn\u00e9 poradie pod\u013ea d\u0148a jeho vzniku. K jeho v\u00fdkonu v\u0161ak m\u00f4\u017ee verite\u013e prist\u00fapi\u0165 a\u017e po pr\u00e1voplatnosti s\u00fadneho rozhodnutia, ktor\u00fdm mu bude zabezpe\u010dovan\u00e1 poh\u013ead\u00e1vka priznan\u00e1 (pris\u00faden\u00e1).<\/p>\n
S\u00fad sa pri nariaden\u00ed zabezpe\u010dovacieho opatrenia spolieha predov\u0161etk\u00fdm na skuto\u010dnosti tvrden\u00e9 navrhovate\u013eom, a preto, ak neodkladn\u00e9 opatrenie zaniklo alebo bolo zru\u0161en\u00e9 z in\u00e9ho d\u00f4vodu ne\u017e preto, \u017ee sa n\u00e1vrhu vo veci samej vyhovelo, alebo preto, \u017ee pr\u00e1vo navrhovate\u013ea bolo uspokojen\u00e9, nastupuje pr\u00edsna procesn\u00e1 zodpovednos\u0165. V jej r\u00e1mci navrhovate\u013e zodpoved\u00e1 za \u0161kodu ka\u017ed\u00e9mu, komu tak\u00fdmto opatren\u00edm \u0161koda vznikla.<\/p>\n
Na z\u00e1ver treba podotkn\u00fa\u0165, \u017ee pokia\u013e n\u00e1vrh na vydanie zabezpe\u010dovacieho opatrenia nem\u00e1 z\u00e1konn\u00e9 n\u00e1le\u017eitosti, s\u00fad navrhovate\u013ea nevyzve na jeho opravu, ale n\u00e1vrh rovno odmietne. Ke\u010f\u017ee pri zabezpe\u010dovacom opatren\u00ed je ur\u010duj\u00faca najm\u00e4 r\u00fdchlos\u0165 poskytnutia ochrany, odpor\u00fa\u010dame v tejto veci oslovi\u0165 advok\u00e1ta.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Slovensko: Za \u00fa\u010delom lep\u0161ej vymo\u017eite\u013enosti uplat\u0148ovan\u00e9ho n\u00e1roku m\u00f4\u017ee s\u00fad zriadi\u0165 z\u00e1lo\u017en\u00e9 pr\u00e1vo na majetku dl\u017en\u00edka. Nosnou \u00falohou rekodifik\u00e1cie civiln\u00e9ho procesu bolo prispie\u0165 k rie\u0161eniu jedn\u00e9ho z najp\u00e1l\u010divej\u0161\u00edch spolo\u010densk\u00fdch probl\u00e9mov, ktor\u00fdm bezpochyby je vymo\u017eite\u013enos\u0165 pr\u00e1va. Neraz sa stane, \u017ee po\u010das dlhotrvaj\u00faceho s\u00fadneho sporu, ak\u00fdch je na Slovensku ne\u00farekom, sa dl\u017en\u00edk vzh\u013eadom na nepriazniv\u00fd v\u00fdvoj situ\u00e1cie za\u010dne […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":5466,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[103],"tags":[104],"class_list":["post-7221","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-bnt","tag-slovakia"],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/lynx.legal\/sk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7221","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/lynx.legal\/sk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/lynx.legal\/sk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lynx.legal\/sk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lynx.legal\/sk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=7221"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/lynx.legal\/sk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7221\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lynx.legal\/sk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/5466"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/lynx.legal\/sk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=7221"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lynx.legal\/sk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=7221"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lynx.legal\/sk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=7221"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}