\u012apa\u0161i v\u0101ciski run\u0101jo\u0161aj\u0101s valst\u012bs uz\u0146\u0113mumu kop\u012bga p\u0101rst\u0101v\u012bba, ko veic vad\u012bbas loceklis kop\u0101 ar pilnvarotu sekret\u0101ru, ir standarta prakse. Vai \u010cehijas likumi pie\u013cauj l\u012bdz\u012bgu p\u0101rst\u0101v\u012bbas veidu?<\/p>\n
Vad\u012bbas nol\u016bkos \u010detru acu princips ir popul\u0101rs instruments savstarp\u0113jas uzraudz\u012bbas un kontroles nodro\u0161in\u0101\u0161anai. Parasti tas izpau\u017eas k\u0101 pras\u012bba, saska\u0146\u0101 ar kuru uz\u0146\u0113mumu var saist\u012bt tikai vair\u0101ki \u2013 t.\u00a0i., parasti divi \u2013 izpildinstit\u016bcijas (\u201clikum\u0101 noteikt\u0101s\u201d) locek\u013ci, kas r\u012bkojas kop\u012bgi. Ir gan ierasts, gan likum\u012bgi, ka vair\u0101ki likum\u0101 noteikt\u0101s instit\u016bcijas locek\u013ci, r\u012bkojoties kop\u012bgi, p\u0101rst\u0101v uz\u0146\u0113mumu. Bet k\u0101 ir ar kop\u012bgu p\u0101rst\u0101v\u012bbu, ko veic izpildinstit\u016bcijas loceklis un pilnvarots sekret\u0101rs ar pilnvar\u0101m?<\/p>\n
Laiku pa laikam pie mums v\u0113r\u0161as klienti ar l\u016bgumu ieviest \u010detru acu principu sav\u0101 korporat\u012bvaj\u0101 p\u0101rvald\u012bb\u0101, kop\u012bgi r\u012bkojoties r\u012bkot\u0101jdirektoram un pilnvarotam sekret\u0101ram. \u0160ie klienti parasti ir \u0101rvalstu uz\u0146\u0113mumi ar v\u0101cu vai austrie\u0161u vad\u012bbu, kur \u0161\u0101da vieno\u0161an\u0101s ir popul\u0101ra.<\/p>\n
\u0160\u0101da vieno\u0161an\u0101s bija nep\u0101rprotami nepie\u013caujama saska\u0146\u0101 ar Komerclikumu (Likums Nr.\u00a0513\/1991 Coll.), kas bija sp\u0113k\u0101 l\u012bdz 2013.\u00a0gada 31.\u00a0decembrim (sk., piem\u0113ram, Pr\u0101gas Augst\u0101k\u0101s tiesas spriedumu liet\u0101\u00a07 Cmo\u00a055\/99). Galvenie argumenti, kas noraid\u012bja \u0161\u0101das p\u0101rst\u0101v\u012bbas veida iesp\u0113jam\u012bbu, ietv\u0113ra at\u0161\u0137ir\u012bgo \u0161o uz\u0146\u0113muma amatpersonu atbild\u012bbas pak\u0101pi (jo r\u012bkot\u0101jdirektoram bija j\u0101r\u012bkojas ar pien\u0101c\u012bgu r\u016bp\u012bbu, at\u0161\u0137ir\u012bb\u0101 no pilnvarot\u0101 sekret\u0101ra), un faktu, ka r\u012bkot\u0101jdirektors r\u012bkojas uz\u0146\u0113muma v\u0101rd\u0101 \u2014 \u201cuz\u0146\u0113muma v\u0101rd\u0101\u201d, savuk\u0101rt pilnvarotais sekret\u0101rs tikai p\u0101rst\u0101v uz\u0146\u0113mumu, pamatojoties uz (b\u016bt\u012bb\u0101) pilnvaru.<\/p>\n
Debates par \u201clikum\u0101 noteikt\u0101s iest\u0101des\u201d kop\u012bgas r\u012bc\u012bbas pie\u013caujam\u012bbu… un pilnvarot\u0101 sekret\u0101ra amats tika atjaunots l\u012bdz ar jaun\u0101 Civilkodeksa (Likums Nr.\u00a089\/2012\u00a0likumd.) un Korpor\u0101ciju likuma (Likums Nr.\u00a090\/2012\u00a0likumd.) pie\u0146em\u0161anu, kas abi st\u0101j\u0101s sp\u0113k\u0101 2014.\u00a0gada 1.\u00a0janv\u0101r\u012b. Saska\u0146\u0101 ar jaunajiem noteikumiem ar\u012b pilnvarotajam sekret\u0101ram tagad ir j\u0101r\u012bkojas ar pien\u0101c\u012bgu r\u016bp\u012bbu, savuk\u0101rt izpildinstit\u016bcijas locek\u013ci tagad (ar\u012b) “p\u0101rst\u0101v” uz\u0146\u0113mumu. T\u0101d\u0113j\u0101di var \u0161\u0137ist, ka galvenie \u0161\u0137\u0113r\u0161\u013ci kop\u012bgai p\u0101rst\u0101v\u012bbas formai ir nov\u0113rsti.<\/p>\n
Ta\u010du t\u0101 nav, k\u0101 redzams jaun\u0101kajos Augst\u0101k\u0101s tiesas l\u0113mumos (4 Cmo 184\/2014 vai 14 Cmo 576\/2014), kuros t\u0101 apstiprin\u0101ja, ka uz\u0146\u0113mumu nevar juridiski p\u0101rst\u0101v\u0113t pilnvarots sekret\u0101rs ar pilnvar\u0101m, r\u012bkojoties kop\u012bgi ar izpildinstit\u016bcijas locekli, un ka \u0161\u0101da p\u0101rst\u0101v\u012bbas forma t\u0101d\u0113j\u0101di nav piem\u0113rota iek\u013cau\u0161anai Komerclikum\u0101.<\/p>\n
Galojo\u0161o v\u0101rdu (pag\u0101ju\u0161\u0101 gada beig\u0101s) teica \u010cehijas Augst\u0101k\u0101 tiesa, kas sav\u0101 2017. gada 31. oktobra spriedum\u0101 29 Cdo 387\/2016 apstiprin\u0101ja iepriek\u0161 min\u0113to Augst\u0101k\u0101s tiesas pausto juridisko viedokli. Saska\u0146\u0101 ar Augst\u0101k\u0101s tiesas l\u0113mumu izpildinstit\u016bcijas locek\u013cu p\u0101rst\u0101v\u012bbas pilnvaras nedr\u012bkst b\u016bt saist\u012btas ar kop\u012bgu r\u012bc\u012bbu ar cit\u0101m person\u0101m, kas nav \u0161\u012bs instit\u016bcijas locek\u013ci. \u0160\u0101da vieno\u0161an\u0101s b\u016btu pretrun\u0101 ar noteikumiem, kas reglament\u0113 likum\u0101 noteikt\u0101s instit\u016bcijas un veidu, k\u0101d\u0101 to locek\u013ci p\u0101rst\u0101v juridiskas personas. Turkl\u0101t Augst\u0101k\u0101 tiesa uzsv\u0113ra, ka nedr\u012bkst ignor\u0113t pilnvarot\u0101 sekret\u0101ra p\u0101rst\u0101v\u012bbas pilnvaru ierobe\u017eojumu, jo vi\u0146\u0161 var saist\u012bt uz\u0146\u0113mumu tikai attiec\u012bb\u0101 uz Civilkodeksa 450. panta (1) da\u013c\u0101 uzskait\u012btajiem juridiskajiem dar\u012bjumiem (ierobe\u017eojums, kas neattiecas uz vad\u012bt\u0101jiem). Turkl\u0101t Augst\u0101k\u0101 tiesa paskaidroja, ka jebkura klauzula, kas paredz r\u012bkot\u0101jdirektora un pilnvarot\u0101 sekret\u0101ra kop\u012bgu r\u012bc\u012bbu k\u0101 valdes locek\u013cu noteikto uz\u0146\u0113muma p\u0101rst\u0101v\u012bbas veidu, b\u016btu pretrun\u0101 ar Civilkodeksa 1. panta (2) da\u013cu un 164. panta (2) da\u013cu un b\u016btu klaj\u0161 likuma par personu ties\u012bbsp\u0113ju p\u0101rk\u0101pums, t.i., k\u0101 t\u0101ds, sabiedrisk\u0101s k\u0101rt\u012bbas p\u0101rk\u0101pums. Augst\u0101k\u0101 tiesa secin\u0101ja, ka jebkura \u0161\u0101da vieno\u0161an\u0101s dibin\u0101\u0161anas l\u012bgum\u0101 ir sp\u0113k\u0101 neeso\u0161a un ties\u0101m t\u0101 j\u0101uzskata par sp\u0113k\u0101 neeso\u0161u pat tad, ja neviena no pus\u0113m nav iesniegusi pieteikumu par deklarat\u012bvu spriedumu \u0161\u0101d\u0101 sakar\u0101.<\/p>\n
Nosl\u0113gum\u0101 varam tikai rezum\u0113t, ka valdes locek\u013ca kop\u012bga r\u012bc\u012bba kop\u0101 ar pilnvaroto sekret\u0101ru joproj\u0101m nav pie\u013caujama. M\u0113s iesak\u0101m visiem klientiem, kuriem joproj\u0101m ir sp\u0113k\u0101 \u0161\u0101ds noteikums, p\u0113c iesp\u0113jas \u0101tr\u0101k groz\u012bt savu dibin\u0101\u0161anas l\u012bgumu, lai nov\u0113rstu nepiln\u012bbas.<\/p>\n
Avots: \uf02d Likums Nr.\u00a089\/2012\u00a0likumd. \uf02d Likums Nr.\u00a090\/2012\u00a0likumd. \uf02d Likums Nr.\u00a0304\/2013\u00a0likumd. \uf02d Augst\u0101k\u0101s tiesas rezol\u016bcija Nr.\u00a029 Cdo 387\/2016 \uf02d Pr\u0101gas Augst\u0101k\u0101s tiesas l\u0113mums Nr.\u00a07 Cmo 55\/99 \uf02d Pr\u0101gas Augst\u0101k\u0101s tiesas l\u0113mums Nr.\u00a04 Cmo 184\/2014 \uf02d Pr\u0101gas Augst\u0101k\u0101s tiesas l\u0113mums Nr.\u00a014 Cmo 576\/2014<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
\u012apa\u0161i v\u0101ciski run\u0101jo\u0161aj\u0101s valst\u012bs uz\u0146\u0113mumu kop\u012bga p\u0101rst\u0101v\u012bba, ko veic vad\u012bbas loceklis kop\u0101 ar pilnvarotu sekret\u0101ru, ir standarta prakse. Vai \u010cehijas likumi pie\u013cauj l\u012bdz\u012bgu p\u0101rst\u0101v\u012bbas veidu? Vad\u012bbas nol\u016bkos \u010detru acu princips ir popul\u0101rs instruments savstarp\u0113jas uzraudz\u012bbas un kontroles nodro\u0161in\u0101\u0161anai. Parasti tas izpau\u017eas k\u0101 pras\u012bba, saska\u0146\u0101 ar kuru uz\u0146\u0113mumu var saist\u012bt tikai vair\u0101ki \u2013 t.\u00a0i., parasti divi […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":5471,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[111],"tags":[112],"class_list":["post-7388","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-bnt","tag-latvian"],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/lynx.legal\/lv\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7388","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/lynx.legal\/lv\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/lynx.legal\/lv\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lynx.legal\/lv\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lynx.legal\/lv\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=7388"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/lynx.legal\/lv\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7388\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lynx.legal\/lv\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/5471"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/lynx.legal\/lv\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=7388"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lynx.legal\/lv\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=7388"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lynx.legal\/lv\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=7388"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}