Czech Republic: \u0160ikan\u00f3zn\u00ed insolven\u010dn\u00ed n\u00e1vrh m\u016f\u017ee zalo\u017eit nejen povinnost k n\u00e1hrad\u011b \u0161kody, ale tak\u00e9 trestn\u00ed odpov\u011bdnost<\/p>\n
P\u0159\u00edpad projednan\u00fd Nejvy\u0161\u0161\u00edm soudem \u010cesk\u00e9 republiky pod spisovou zna\u010dkou 8 Tdo 1352\/2014 se t\u00fdkal n\u00e1vrhu na zah\u00e1jen\u00ed insolven\u010dn\u00edho \u0159\u00edzen\u00ed, jeho\u017e \u00fa\u010delem nebylo \u0159e\u0161en\u00ed \u00fapadkov\u00e9 situace dlu\u017en\u00edka, ale snaha o nez\u00e1konn\u00e9 obohacen\u00ed navrhovatele. <\/p>\n
Nejvy\u0161\u0161\u00edm soudem bylo zji\u0161t\u011bno, \u017ee navrhovatel podal insolven\u010dn\u00ed n\u00e1vrh, p\u0159esto\u017ee si byl pln\u011b v\u011bdom, \u017ee j\u00edm uplatn\u011bn\u00e1 pohled\u00e1vka za \u201edlu\u017en\u00edkem\u201c je neopr\u00e1vn\u011bn\u00e1 a \u201edlu\u017en\u00edk\u201c se nenach\u00e1z\u00ed v \u00fapadku. Navrhovatel si byl v\u011bdom negativn\u00edch d\u016fsledk\u016f insolven\u010dn\u00edho \u0159\u00edzen\u00ed (zejm\u00e9na po\u0161kozen\u00ed dobr\u00e9ho jm\u00e9na \u201edlu\u017en\u00edka\u201c p\u0159\u00edpadn\u011b znemo\u017en\u011bn\u00ed \u00fa\u010dasti \u201edlu\u017en\u00edka\u201c jako uchaze\u010de v \u0159\u00edzen\u00ed o ve\u0159ejnou zak\u00e1zku) a t\u00edm se sna\u017eil p\u0159im\u011bt \u201edlu\u017en\u00edka\u201c k zaplacen\u00ed neopr\u00e1vn\u011bn\u00fdch pen\u011b\u017en\u00edch n\u00e1rok\u016f a ke zp\u011btvzet\u00ed d\u0159\u00edve podan\u00e9 \u017ealoby. <\/p>\n
Navrhovatel byl uzn\u00e1n vinn\u00fdm p\u0159e\u010dinem pomluvy, nebo\u0165 o jin\u00e9m sd\u011blil nepravdiv\u00fd \u00fadaj, kter\u00fd je zp\u016fsobil\u00fd zna\u010dnou m\u011brou ohrozit jeho v\u00e1\u017enost u spoluob\u010dan\u016f, a p\u0159e\u010dinem vyd\u00edr\u00e1n\u00ed, nebo\u0165 jedn\u00e1n\u00ed navrhovatele slou\u017eilo nikoliv k \u0159e\u0161en\u00ed \u00fapadku, ale k donucen\u00ed jin\u00e9 osoby, kter\u00e1 nen\u00ed v \u00fapadku, aby n\u011bco konala, opominula nebo trp\u011bla. <\/p>\n
S ohledem na v\u00fd\u0161e uveden\u00e9 lze p\u0159edpokl\u00e1dat, \u017ee riziko trestn\u011bpr\u00e1vn\u00edho postihu za \u0161ikan\u00f3zn\u00ed insolven\u010dn\u00ed n\u00e1vrh bude m\u00edt do budoucna nezanedbatelnou ochrannou funkci. Sou\u010dasn\u00e1 po\u0159\u00e1dkov\u00e1 pokuta do v\u00fd\u0161e 50.000,- K\u010d ve smyslu ustanoven\u00ed \u00a7 128a insolven\u010dn\u00edho z\u00e1kona nebo n\u00e1hrada \u0161kody v p\u0159\u00edpadn\u00e9m ob\u010danskopr\u00e1vn\u00edm \u0159\u00edzen\u00ed se toti\u017e uk\u00e1zaly jako ne zcela \u00fa\u010dinn\u00e9. Riziko trestn\u011bpr\u00e1vn\u00edho postihu konkr\u00e9tn\u00edch fyzick\u00fdch osob by v\u0161ak svoji ochrannou funkci naplnit mohlo. <\/p>\n
Zdroj: Rozhodnut\u00ed Nejvy\u0161\u0161\u00edho soudu ze dne 26.02.2015 veden\u00e9 pod \u010d\u00edslem jednac\u00edm 8 Tdo 1352\/2014-38<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Czech Republic: \u0160ikan\u00f3zn\u00ed insolven\u010dn\u00ed n\u00e1vrh m\u016f\u017ee zalo\u017eit nejen povinnost k n\u00e1hrad\u011b \u0161kody, ale tak\u00e9 trestn\u00ed odpov\u011bdnost P\u0159\u00edpad projednan\u00fd Nejvy\u0161\u0161\u00edm soudem \u010cesk\u00e9 republiky pod spisovou zna\u010dkou 8 Tdo 1352\/2014 se t\u00fdkal n\u00e1vrhu na zah\u00e1jen\u00ed insolven\u010dn\u00edho \u0159\u00edzen\u00ed, jeho\u017e \u00fa\u010delem nebylo \u0159e\u0161en\u00ed \u00fapadkov\u00e9 situace dlu\u017en\u00edka, ale snaha o nez\u00e1konn\u00e9 obohacen\u00ed navrhovatele. Nejvy\u0161\u0161\u00edm soudem bylo zji\u0161t\u011bno, \u017ee navrhovatel podal […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":5470,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[78],"tags":[79],"class_list":["post-6859","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-bnt","tag-czech"],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/lynx.legal\/cs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6859","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/lynx.legal\/cs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/lynx.legal\/cs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lynx.legal\/cs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lynx.legal\/cs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=6859"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/lynx.legal\/cs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6859\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lynx.legal\/cs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/5470"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/lynx.legal\/cs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=6859"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lynx.legal\/cs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=6859"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lynx.legal\/cs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=6859"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}