{"id":6847,"date":"2019-01-25T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2019-01-25T00:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/lynx.legal\/news\/narok-nabyvatele-podilu-v-s-r-o-na-vyplaceni-zisku\/"},"modified":"2019-01-25T00:00:00","modified_gmt":"2019-01-25T00:00:00","slug":"narok-nabyvatele-podilu-v-s-r-o-na-vyplaceni-zisku","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/lynx.legal\/cs\/narok-nabyvatele-podilu-v-s-r-o-na-vyplaceni-zisku\/","title":{"rendered":"N\u00e1rok nabyvatele pod\u00edlu v s.r.o. na vyplacen\u00ed zisku"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p>Podle Nejvy\u0161\u0161\u00edho soudu p\u0159ech\u00e1z\u00ed n\u00e1rok na vyplacen\u00ed pod\u00edlu na zisku na nabyvatele pod\u00edlu a d\u016fvodem neplatnosti usnesen\u00ed valn\u00e9 hromady m\u016f\u017ee b\u00fdt i rozpor usnesen\u00ed s dobr\u00fdmi mravy.<\/p>\n<p>Nejvy\u0161\u0161\u00ed soud konstatoval, \u017ee je-li pod\u00edl v s.r.o. p\u0159eveden pot\u00e9, kdy valn\u00e1 hromada rozhodla o rozd\u011blen\u00ed zisku, ale d\u0159\u00edve ne\u017e je zisk vyplacen, p\u0159ech\u00e1z\u00ed n\u00e1rok na vyplacen\u00ed pod\u00edlu na zisku na nabyvatele pod\u00edlu jako\u017eto pr\u00e1vo plynouc\u00ed z \u00fa\u010dasti na spole\u010dnosti.<\/p>\n<p>Pr\u00e1vo spole\u010dn\u00edka podat n\u00e1vrh na vysloven\u00ed neplatnosti usnesen\u00ed valn\u00e9 hromady s.r.o. podle \u00a7 191 ZOK je pr\u00e1vem plynouc\u00edm z \u00fa\u010dasti ve spole\u010dnosti. Je-li pod\u00edl ve spole\u010dnosti p\u0159eveden pot\u00e9, kdy valn\u00e1 hromada p\u0159ijala usnesen\u00ed, ale d\u0159\u00edve ne\u017e p\u0159evodci uplyne lh\u016fta k pod\u00e1n\u00ed n\u00e1vrhu podle \u00a7 191 ZOK, p\u0159ech\u00e1z\u00ed na nabyvatele i pr\u00e1vo napadat platnost tohoto usnesen\u00ed, a to \u201ev tom stavu\u201c, v jak\u00e9m sv\u011bd\u010dilo p\u0159evodci, bez ohledu na to, zda se ho toto usnesen\u00ed bezprost\u0159edn\u011b dot\u00fdk\u00e1.<\/p>\n<p>To znamen\u00e1, \u017ee p\u0159evod pod\u00edlu nem\u00e1 vliv na b\u011bh subjektivn\u00ed lh\u016fty pro pod\u00e1n\u00ed n\u00e1vrhu podle \u00a7 259 NOZ. Jestli\u017ee ji\u017e p\u0159ed p\u0159evodem pod\u00edlu za\u010dala b\u011b\u017eet p\u0159evodci subjektivn\u00ed lh\u016fta pro pod\u00e1n\u00ed n\u00e1vrhu, pokra\u010duje b\u011bh t\u00e9to lh\u016fty bez ohledu na p\u0159evod pod\u00edlu. Lh\u016fta ub\u011bhne uplynut\u00edm t\u0159\u00ed m\u011bs\u00edc\u016f ode dne, kdy se p\u0159evodce dozv\u011bd\u011bl \u010di mohl dozv\u011bd\u011bt o usnesen\u00ed valn\u00e9 hromady.<\/p>\n<p>Nabyvatel je takt\u00e9\u017e omezen pravidly upraven\u00fdmi v \u00a7 192 (2) ZOK. Neplatnosti usnesen\u00ed valn\u00e9 hromady se m\u016f\u017ee dom\u00e1hat za stejn\u00fdch podm\u00ednek jako p\u0159evodce. Nen\u00ed tud\u00ed\u017e spr\u00e1vn\u00fd n\u00e1zor, \u017ee nabyvateli pod\u00edlu je otev\u0159ena mo\u017enost uplat\u0148ovat jak\u00e9koliv d\u016fvody neplatnosti usnesen\u00ed valn\u00e9 hromady jen proto, \u017ee se jej\u00edho zased\u00e1n\u00ed ne\u00fa\u010dastnil nebo v t\u00e9 dob\u011b nebyl spole\u010dn\u00edkem.<\/p>\n<p>Samoz\u0159ejm\u011b i pro nabyvatele pod\u00edlu plat\u00ed, \u017ee platnost usnesen\u00ed valn\u00e9 hromady m\u016f\u017ee napadat z d\u016fvod\u016f, kter\u00e9 na zased\u00e1n\u00ed valn\u00e9 hromady nebylo mo\u017en\u00e9 bez nep\u0159im\u011b\u0159en\u00e9ho \u00fasil\u00ed \u010di n\u00e1klad\u016f zjistit. D\u016fvodem neplatnosti usnesen\u00ed valn\u00e9 hromady je i rozpor tohoto usnesen\u00ed s dobr\u00fdmi mravy. P\u0159i posouzen\u00ed, zda je usnesen\u00ed valn\u00e9 hromady v rozporu s dobr\u00fdmi mravy a zda je tak d\u00e1n d\u016fvod pro vysloven\u00ed jeho neplatnosti, je t\u0159eba p\u0159ihl\u00e9dnout ke v\u0161em okolnostem konkr\u00e9tn\u00ed v\u011bci.<\/p>\n<p>Bylo-li by nap\u0159. jedin\u00fdm \u00fa\u010delem usnesen\u00ed valn\u00e9 hromady zabr\u00e1nit tomu, aby na nabyvatele p\u0159e\u0161el spolu s pod\u00edlem takt\u00e9\u017e pod\u00edl na zisku, a\u010dkoliv by se tak za \u0159\u00e1dn\u00e9ho b\u011bhu v\u011bc\u00ed stalo, a sou\u010dasn\u011b marginalizovat pod\u00edl nabyvatele ve spole\u010dnosti cestou zv\u00fd\u0161en\u00ed z\u00e1kladn\u00edho kapit\u00e1lu a zapo\u010dten\u00ed pohled\u00e1vky druh\u00e9ho spole\u010dn\u00edka za spole\u010dnost\u00ed (z titulu pod\u00edlu na zisku) na jeho vkladovou povinnost, lze takov\u00e9 jedn\u00e1n\u00ed ozna\u010dit za zneu\u017e\u00edvaj\u00edc\u00ed a nemravn\u00e9 a lze i vyslovit neplatnost takov\u00e9ho usnesen\u00ed pro rozpor s dobr\u00fdmi mravy.<\/p>\n<p>  Zdroj: Usnesen\u00ed Nejvy\u0161\u0161\u00edho soudu \u010cR sp. zn. 27 Cdo 1499\/2017, ze dne 10.10.2018  <\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Podle Nejvy\u0161\u0161\u00edho soudu p\u0159ech\u00e1z\u00ed n\u00e1rok na vyplacen\u00ed pod\u00edlu na zisku na nabyvatele pod\u00edlu a d\u016fvodem neplatnosti usnesen\u00ed valn\u00e9 hromady m\u016f\u017ee b\u00fdt i rozpor usnesen\u00ed s dobr\u00fdmi mravy. Nejvy\u0161\u0161\u00ed soud konstatoval, \u017ee je-li pod\u00edl v s.r.o. p\u0159eveden pot\u00e9, kdy valn\u00e1 hromada rozhodla o rozd\u011blen\u00ed zisku, ale d\u0159\u00edve ne\u017e je zisk vyplacen, p\u0159ech\u00e1z\u00ed n\u00e1rok na vyplacen\u00ed pod\u00edlu [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":5470,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[78],"tags":[79],"class_list":["post-6847","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-bnt","tag-czech"],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/lynx.legal\/cs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6847","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/lynx.legal\/cs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/lynx.legal\/cs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lynx.legal\/cs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lynx.legal\/cs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=6847"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/lynx.legal\/cs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6847\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lynx.legal\/cs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/5470"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/lynx.legal\/cs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=6847"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lynx.legal\/cs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=6847"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lynx.legal\/cs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=6847"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}