{"id":19322,"date":"2026-10-19T10:11:17","date_gmt":"2026-10-19T10:11:17","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/lynx.legal\/zaloba-muze-byt-projednatelna-a-presto-neuspesna-rozhoduje-i-aktivita-u-soudu\/"},"modified":"2026-10-19T10:27:49","modified_gmt":"2026-10-19T10:27:49","slug":"zaloba-muze-byt-projednatelna-a-presto-neuspesna-rozhoduje-i-aktivita-u-soudu","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/lynx.legal\/cs\/zaloba-muze-byt-projednatelna-a-presto-neuspesna-rozhoduje-i-aktivita-u-soudu\/","title":{"rendered":"\u017daloba m\u016f\u017ee b\u00fdt projednateln\u00e1, a p\u0159esto ne\u00fasp\u011b\u0161n\u00e1. Rozhoduje i aktivita u soudu"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>I projednateln\u00e1 \u017ealoba m\u016f\u017ee skon\u010dit ne\u00fasp\u011bchem. Pro\u010d je d\u016fle\u017eit\u00e9 tvrdit konkr\u00e9tn\u011b, navrhnout d\u016fkazy a dostavit se k jedn\u00e1n\u00ed?<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">\u00da\u010dast v soudn\u00edm \u0159\u00edzen\u00ed nen\u00ed jen ot\u00e1zkou form\u00e1ln\u00edho pod\u00e1n\u00ed \u017ealoby. P\u0159ipom\u00edn\u00e1 to usnesen\u00ed Nejvy\u0161\u0161\u00edho soudu ze dne 27. kv\u011btna 2026, sp. zn. 25 Cdo 1467\/2025, vydan\u00e9 ve sporu o pojistn\u00e9 pln\u011bn\u00ed za \u00fadajn\u00e9 trval\u00e9 n\u00e1sledky \u00farazu. \u017dalobce po\u017eadoval 8,5 milionu K\u010d, nepopsal v\u0161ak dostate\u010dn\u011b, jak m\u011blo k \u00farazu doj\u00edt. Jeho z\u00e1stupce se nav\u00edc bez omluvy nedostavil k soudn\u00edmu jedn\u00e1n\u00ed. \u017daloba byla zam\u00edtnuta a Nejvy\u0161\u0161\u00ed soud dovol\u00e1n\u00ed odm\u00edtl jako nep\u0159\u00edpustn\u00e9.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><strong>Projednatelnost \u017ealoby vs. d\u016fkazn\u00ed b\u0159emeno<\/strong><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Podstatou rozhodnut\u00ed Nejvy\u0161\u0161\u00edho soudu je rozd\u00edl mezi projednatelnost\u00ed \u017ealoby a unesen\u00edm b\u0159emene tvrzen\u00ed. \u017daloba mus\u00ed vymezit n\u00e1rok tak, aby jej nebylo mo\u017en\u00e9 zam\u011bnit s jin\u00fdm. Nemus\u00ed v\u0161ak ji\u017e p\u0159i pod\u00e1n\u00ed obsahovat v\u0161echna tvrzen\u00ed pot\u0159ebn\u00e1 k tomu, aby j\u00ed soud vyhov\u011bl. Pokud tato tvrzen\u00ed chyb\u011bj\u00ed, nejde automaticky o vadu \u017ealoby, kter\u00e1 by br\u00e1nila jej\u00edmu projedn\u00e1n\u00ed; \u017ealobce je v\u0161ak mus\u00ed doplnit v pr\u016fb\u011bhu \u0159\u00edzen\u00ed, jinak riskuje procesn\u00ed ne\u00fasp\u011bch \u2013 zam\u00edtnut\u00ed \u017ealoby.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><strong>Pou\u010dovac\u00ed povinnost p\u0159i jedn\u00e1n\u00ed<\/strong><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Uk\u00e1\u017ee-li se v pr\u016fb\u011bhu jedn\u00e1n\u00ed soudu, \u017ee \u00fa\u010dastn\u00edk<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li><strong>(i) nevyl\u00ed\u010dil v\u0161echny rozhodn\u00e9 skute\u010dnosti,<\/strong><\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>(ii) uvedl rozhodn\u00e9 skute\u010dnosti ne\u00fapln\u011b,<\/strong><\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>(iii) v\u011bc je mo\u017en\u00e9 po pr\u00e1vn\u00ed str\u00e1nce posoudit jinak ne\u017e podle \u00fa\u010dastn\u00edkova pr\u00e1vn\u00edho n\u00e1zoru, anebo<\/strong><\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>(iv) \u00fa\u010dastn\u00edk dosud nenavrhl d\u016fkazy pot\u0159ebn\u00e9 k prok\u00e1z\u00e1n\u00ed v\u0161ech sv\u00fdch sporn\u00fdch tvrzen\u00ed,<\/strong><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">vyzve p\u0159edseda sen\u00e1tu \u00fa\u010dastn\u00edka, aby sv\u00e1 tvrzen\u00ed doplnil, resp. d\u016fkazy ozna\u010dil, a pou\u010d\u00ed jej, jak\u00e9 by byly n\u00e1sledky nespln\u011bn\u00ed t\u00e9to v\u00fdzvy.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"has-background wp-block-paragraph\" style=\"background-color:#f5fef0\">Toto pou\u010den\u00ed v\u0161ak m\u016f\u017ee soud poskytnout jen tomu, kdo je u jedn\u00e1n\u00ed p\u0159\u00edtomen, p\u0159\u00edpadn\u011b jeho p\u0159\u00edtomn\u00e9mu z\u00e1stupci. Jestli\u017ee soud v souladu se z\u00e1konem jedn\u00e1 v nep\u0159\u00edtomnosti \u0159\u00e1dn\u011b p\u0159edvolan\u00e9ho \u00fa\u010dastn\u00edka \u010di z\u00e1stupce, nemus\u00ed jedn\u00e1n\u00ed odro\u010dit jen proto, aby mu dal p\u0159\u00edle\u017eitost tvrzen\u00ed doplnit.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><strong>Dopad pro praxi<\/strong><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Rozhodnut\u00ed Nejvy\u0161\u0161\u00edho soudu je praktick\u00fdm upozorn\u011bn\u00edm pro v\u0161echny \u00fa\u010dastn\u00edky vedouc\u00ed soudn\u00ed spory. Nesta\u010d\u00ed m\u00edt za to, \u017ee \u201ev\u011bc vysv\u011btl\u00ed d\u016fkazy\u201c \u2013 nejprve je t\u0159eba konkr\u00e9tn\u011b tvrdit, co se stalo, a ozna\u010dit, \u010d\u00edm m\u00e1 b\u00fdt ka\u017ed\u00e9 podstatn\u00e9 tvrzen\u00ed prok\u00e1z\u00e1no. Stejn\u011b d\u016fle\u017eit\u00e9 je sledovat pr\u016fb\u011bh \u0159\u00edzen\u00ed, reagovat na argumenty protistrany a p\u0159edev\u0161\u00edm zajistit \u00fa\u010dast u jedn\u00e1n\u00ed; ne\u00fa\u010dast m\u016f\u017ee znamenat ztr\u00e1tu p\u0159\u00edle\u017eitosti odstranit nedostatky, na nich\u017e bude v\u00fdsledek sporu z\u00e1viset.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>Zdroj: Usnesen\u00ed Nejvy\u0161\u0161\u00edho soudu ze dne 27. kv\u011btna 2026, sp. zn. 25 Cdo 1467\/2025<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Autor: <a href=\"https:\/\/lynx.legal\/cs\/t\u00fdm\/miroslav-kopecek\/\">Miroslav Kope\u010dek<\/a>, Senior Associate, <a href=\"https:\/\/lynx.legal\/cs\/oblasti-praxe\/reseni-sporu\/\">Dispute Resolution<\/a>, LYNX Czech Republic<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>I projednateln\u00e1 \u017ealoba m\u016f\u017ee skon\u010dit ne\u00fasp\u011bchem. Pro\u010d je d\u016fle\u017eit\u00e9 tvrdit konkr\u00e9tn\u011b, navrhnout d\u016fkazy a dostavit se k jedn\u00e1n\u00ed? \u00da\u010dast v soudn\u00edm \u0159\u00edzen\u00ed nen\u00ed jen ot\u00e1zkou form\u00e1ln\u00edho pod\u00e1n\u00ed \u017ealoby. P\u0159ipom\u00edn\u00e1 to usnesen\u00ed Nejvy\u0161\u0161\u00edho soudu ze dne 27. kv\u011btna 2026, sp. zn. 25 Cdo 1467\/2025, vydan\u00e9 ve sporu o pojistn\u00e9 pln\u011bn\u00ed za \u00fadajn\u00e9 trval\u00e9 n\u00e1sledky \u00farazu. \u017dalobce [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":18,"featured_media":19313,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[278],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-19322","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-reseni-sporu-a-rozhodci-rizeni"],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/lynx.legal\/cs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/19322","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/lynx.legal\/cs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/lynx.legal\/cs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lynx.legal\/cs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/18"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lynx.legal\/cs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=19322"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"https:\/\/lynx.legal\/cs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/19322\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":19327,"href":"https:\/\/lynx.legal\/cs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/19322\/revisions\/19327"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lynx.legal\/cs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/19313"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/lynx.legal\/cs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=19322"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lynx.legal\/cs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=19322"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lynx.legal\/cs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=19322"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}