{"id":17956,"date":"2026-06-22T09:40:39","date_gmt":"2026-06-22T09:40:39","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/lynx.legal\/obstrukce-dluznika-v-insolvenci-jako-trestny-cin-moznost-obrany-veritelu\/"},"modified":"2026-06-22T11:39:20","modified_gmt":"2026-06-22T11:39:20","slug":"obstrukce-dluznika-v-insolvenci-jako-trestny-cin-moznost-obrany-veritelu","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/lynx.legal\/cs\/obstrukce-dluznika-v-insolvenci-jako-trestny-cin-moznost-obrany-veritelu\/","title":{"rendered":"Obstrukce dlu\u017en\u00edka v insolvenci jako trestn\u00fd \u010din \u2013 mo\u017enost obrany v\u011b\u0159itel\u016f"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>Dlu\u017en\u00edk 11 let blokoval insolvenci n\u00e1mitkami podjatosti a \u017ealobami. Nejvy\u0161\u0161\u00ed soud potvrdil: jde o trestn\u00fd \u010din. Co to znamen\u00e1 pro v\u011b\u0159itele?  <\/strong><\/p>\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><strong>Obstruk\u010dn\u00ed jedn\u00e1n\u00ed dlu\u017en\u00edka<\/strong><\/h2>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Nejvy\u0161\u0161\u00ed soud v usnesen\u00ed sp. zn. 5 Tdo 992\/2025 ze dne 28. 1. 2026 potvrdil odsouzen\u00ed dlu\u017en\u00edka, kter\u00fd n\u011bkolik let systematicky ma\u0159il \u010dinnost p\u0159edb\u011b\u017en\u00e9 insolven\u010dn\u00ed spr\u00e1vkyn\u011b. Obvin\u011bn\u00e9mu byla v r\u00e1mci insolven\u010dn\u00edho \u0159\u00edzen\u00ed zah\u00e1jen\u00e9ho v roce 2014 ulo\u017eena povinnost p\u0159edlo\u017eit seznam majetku a z\u00e1vazk\u016f a byla ustanovena p\u0159edb\u011b\u017en\u00e1 spr\u00e1vkyn\u011b. Dlu\u017en\u00edk j\u00ed v\u0161ak neposkytoval \u017e\u00e1dnou sou\u010dinnost \u2013 nekomunikoval, nep\u0159edlo\u017eil seznam majetku, nesd\u011blil stav \u00fa\u010detnictv\u00ed a neumo\u017enil p\u0159\u00edstup k nemovitostem. Sou\u010dasn\u011b <strong>pod\u00e1val \u0159et\u011bz\u00edc\u00ed se n\u00e1mitky podjatosti v\u016f\u010di spr\u00e1vkyni i soudc\u016fm na r\u016fzn\u00fdch stupn\u00edch a \u0161ikan\u00f3zn\u00ed \u017ealoby s vyfabulovan\u00fdmi n\u00e1roky v \u0159\u00e1du milion\u016f korun<\/strong>. \u0158\u00edzen\u00ed bylo paralyzov\u00e1no t\u00e9m\u011b\u0159 11 let, ani\u017e bylo rozhodnuto o \u00fapadku.    <\/p>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Takov\u00e9 jedn\u00e1n\u00ed n\u00e1sledn\u011b soud v trestn\u00edm \u0159\u00edzen\u00ed vyhodnotil jako p\u0159e\u010din <strong>poru\u0161en\u00ed povinnosti v insolven\u010dn\u00edm \u0159\u00edzen\u00ed<\/strong> podle \u00a7 225 trestn\u00edho z\u00e1kon\u00edku a dlu\u017en\u00edkovi za to ulo\u017eil pen\u011b\u017eit\u00fd trest 100 000 K\u010d.<\/p>\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><strong>Poru\u0161en\u00ed p\u0159edpis\u016f a trestn\u011bpr\u00e1vn\u00ed kvalifikace<\/strong><\/h2>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Povinnost sou\u010dinnosti dlu\u017en\u00edka plyne p\u0159\u00edmo z \u00a7 210 odst. 1 insolven\u010dn\u00edho z\u00e1kona a vznik\u00e1 ze z\u00e1kona, nikoli teprve v\u00fdzvou insolven\u010dn\u00edho spr\u00e1vce. Nejvy\u0161\u0161\u00ed soud v trestn\u00edm \u0159\u00edzen\u00ed v t\u00e9to v\u011bci potvrdil napln\u011bn\u00ed obou alternativ jedn\u00e1n\u00ed dle \u00a7 225 trestn\u00edho z\u00e1kon\u00edku: ma\u0159en\u00ed (usilov\u00e1n\u00ed o znemo\u017en\u011bn\u00ed v\u00fdkonu funkce spr\u00e1vce) i hrub\u00e9 zt\u011b\u017eov\u00e1n\u00ed (vytv\u00e1\u0159en\u00ed podm\u00ednek vy\u017eaduj\u00edc\u00edch od spr\u00e1vce podstatn\u011b v\u00edce \u010dasu a prost\u0159edk\u016f). <\/p>\n\n<blockquote class=\"wp-block-quote is-layout-flow wp-block-quote-is-layout-flow\">\n<p class=\"has-medium-font-size wp-block-paragraph\"><em>Z\u00e1sadn\u00edm z\u00e1v\u011brem je, \u017ee <strong>opakovan\u00e9 zneu\u017e\u00edv\u00e1n\u00ed procesn\u00edch pr\u00e1v \u2013 zde \u0159et\u011bzen\u00ed n\u00e1mitek podjatosti \u2013 nepo\u017e\u00edv\u00e1 pr\u00e1vn\u00ed ochrany ve smyslu \u00a7 8 ob\u010dansk\u00e9ho z\u00e1kon\u00edku, a je-li jeho c\u00edlem paralyzovat \u0159\u00edzen\u00ed, m\u016f\u017ee napl\u0148ovat skutkovou podstatu trestn\u00e9ho \u010dinu.<\/strong><\/em><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><strong>P\u0159\u00ednos pro v\u011b\u0159itele<\/strong><\/h2>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Rozhodnut\u00ed potvrzuje, \u017ee trestn\u00ed pr\u00e1vo chr\u00e1n\u00ed \u00fa\u010del insolven\u010dn\u00edho \u0159\u00edzen\u00ed i z\u00e1jmy v\u011b\u0159itel\u016f. Obstrukce dlu\u017en\u00edka p\u0159\u00edmo ohro\u017euj\u00ed mo\u017enost zjistit a zpen\u011b\u017eit majetek a sni\u017euj\u00ed m\u00edru uspokojen\u00ed pohled\u00e1vek. V\u011b\u0159itel\u00e9 by m\u011bli obstruk\u010dn\u00ed jedn\u00e1n\u00ed dokumentovat a v od\u016fvodn\u011bn\u00fdch p\u0159\u00edpadech podat trestn\u00ed ozn\u00e1men\u00ed podle \u00a7 225 trestn\u00edho z\u00e1kon\u00edku, p\u0159\u00edpadn\u011b takov\u00fd postup koordinovat i s insolven\u010dn\u00edm spr\u00e1vcem.  <\/p>\n\n<p class=\"has-background wp-block-paragraph\" style=\"background-color:#f5fef0\">Aktu\u00e1ln\u00ed rozhodnut\u00ed Nejvy\u0161\u0161\u00edho soudu vys\u00edl\u00e1 jasn\u00fd sign\u00e1l: <strong>zneu\u017e\u00edv\u00e1n\u00ed procesn\u00edch pr\u00e1v k blokov\u00e1n\u00ed insolvence nen\u00ed legitimn\u00ed obrana, ale trestn\u00e1 \u010dinnost.<\/strong><\/p>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Zdroj: Nejvy\u0161\u0161\u00ed soud<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Dlu\u017en\u00edk 11 let blokoval insolvenci n\u00e1mitkami podjatosti a \u017ealobami. Nejvy\u0161\u0161\u00ed soud potvrdil: jde o trestn\u00fd \u010din. Co to znamen\u00e1 pro v\u011b\u0159itele? Obstruk\u010dn\u00ed jedn\u00e1n\u00ed dlu\u017en\u00edka Nejvy\u0161\u0161\u00ed soud v usnesen\u00ed sp. zn. 5 Tdo 992\/2025 ze dne 28. 1. 2026 potvrdil odsouzen\u00ed dlu\u017en\u00edka, kter\u00fd n\u011bkolik let systematicky ma\u0159il \u010dinnost p\u0159edb\u011b\u017en\u00e9 insolven\u010dn\u00ed spr\u00e1vkyn\u011b. Obvin\u011bn\u00e9mu byla v r\u00e1mci insolven\u010dn\u00edho [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":18,"featured_media":17937,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[278],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-17956","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-reseni-sporu-a-rozhodci-rizeni"],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/lynx.legal\/cs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/17956","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/lynx.legal\/cs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/lynx.legal\/cs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lynx.legal\/cs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/18"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lynx.legal\/cs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=17956"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/lynx.legal\/cs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/17956\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":18017,"href":"https:\/\/lynx.legal\/cs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/17956\/revisions\/18017"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lynx.legal\/cs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/17937"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/lynx.legal\/cs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=17956"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lynx.legal\/cs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=17956"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lynx.legal\/cs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=17956"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}